Content
Made by
Frank Verner Grøn
Martin Smidt Kristensen
Peter Hejlesen
Toke Jeberg
Technology adoption lifecycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The technology adoption lifecycle is a sociological model developed by Joe M. Bohlen, George M. Beal and Everett M. Rogers at Iowa State University,[1] building on earlier research conducted there by Neal C. Gross and Bryce Ryan.[2][3][4] Their original purpose was to track the purchase patterns of hybrid seed corn by farmers. Beal, Rogers and Bohlen together developed a technology diffusion model[5] and later Everett Rogers generalized the use of it in his widely acclaimed book, Diffusion of Innovations[6] (now in its fifth edition), describing how new ideas and technologies spread in different cultures. Others have since used the model to describe how innovations spread between states in the U.S.[7] Rogers' bell curve The technology adoption lifecycle model describes the adoption or acceptance of a new product or innovation, according to the demographic and psychological characteristics of defined adopter groups. The process of adoption over time is typically illustrated as a classical normal distribution or "bell curve." The model indicates that the first group of people to use a new product is called "innovators," followed by "early adopters." Next come the early and late majority, and the last group to eventually adopt a product are called "laggards." The demographic and psychological (or "psychographic") profiles of each adoption group were originally specified by the North Central Rural Sociology Committee, Subcommittee for the Study of the Diffusion of Farm Practices (as cited by Beal and Bohlen in their study above). The report summarised the categories as: innovators - had larger farms, were more educated, more prosperous and more risk-oriented early adopters - younger, more educated, tended to be community leaders early majority - more conservative but open to new ideas, active in community and influence to neighbours late majority - older, less educated, fairly conservative and less socially active laggards - very conservative, had small farms and capital, oldest and least educated